Do Unions Benefit Anyone?
When unions go on strike, they draw a lot of attention. Especially when that company is a public servant.
KCAL 9 in Los Angeles reports that the Metropolitan Transit Authority (MTA) mechanics strike cost “$4million a day in lost business, wages and personal income tax revenues.”
This responder to a comment made in a Yahoo! Message Board believes that unions only benefit unions and NOT the employees or communities…
If these worker’s don’t want to work, they don’t have to. They won’t get paid either. It’s called a strike. It’s a free country.
“These same unions will also force a company to give them their back pay for choosing to strike. They will also intimidate people in order for them not to cross the line and “take their jobs.” Give me a break. If they go on strike, they should go to the unemployment office.
If the city is worried people’s lives will be disrupted or that people will lose their jobs, then they can pay the MTA workers more money. Or they can refuse and live with the consequences. It’s not that hard of a concept to figure out.
Extortion is not a valid method of getting a raise. In today’s society unions have long out-lived their usefulness. They use bully-tactics to get what they want for no increase in productivity. The most productive companies are those where unions do not exist.
More money doesn’t make people work harder, employeess have to want to work harder. And companies achieve that goal through the right kind of motivation, pride in one’s company, and having a sense of purpose. Without those three crucial ingredients, a company is doomed to have disgruntled workers who think it’s all about them and no one else. Unions have made workers fat, lazy, over-paid, under-appreciative, and low in morale.
















